As some reviewers correctly hinted, the movie feels like 2 to 3 movie parts put together.
The matter and fact are not new to me and failure to do so, I saw in countless movies and series, leading to minor to big disasters in respect to the budget invested and the efforts put in. But going into a movie that is a B type movie with no name actors (of which the acting was not bad at all) and is made well and is entertaining, it needs to be rated appropriately! So hopefully everyone else who sees this enjoys it as much as I did and rates it accordingly.Īlthough, I enjoyed Take Down for what it presents itself, without having too much expectation, I do believe that when you invest a budget of over 11 million USD in a movie, it needs to have a smooth script and storyline first, then you have the means to put the acting on top of that.
I didn't recognize any actors, budget was clearly low as it wasn't even disclosed, yet the story line was great, acting was good, the scenery was amazing, and I was pleasantly entertained! If a movie has a high budget with A-list actors and top directors/producers and is terrible, it deserves a low score. Yet it was boring, biased, stupid, NOT funny etc. It has how many top rated actors (how many DON'T you know?) as well as a 20 million budget (which went where exactly?). Let me explain Let's take Barber Shop 2 as an example (that has a 5.9 average). What I mean by that is a movie needs to be rated on the investment/production value as well as entertainment. Why? Because you can't compare apples to oranges. I'm hoping once people read my review, they will rate this movie appropriately. Once again I am shocked at the low 5.3 average score for this movie.
0 kommentar(er)
